This is the last parliament vote on the draft before it is instated as legislation and comes after extensive debates on Indirect Land Use Change, in a European Council, Parliament and Commission trialogue and in the Environment Committee.
The cap on the volume of crops allowed to be used for biofuel processing will be reduced from ten to 7 per cent should the compromise be adopted. The NFU says this will further expose farmers to market volatility as it will narrow the biofuels market for wheat, oilseed rape and sugar beet.
The NFU believes that the ‘food vs. fuel’ basis for the legislation is invalid as the stable, reliable and domestic supply high-protein animal feed made from the biofuel processing co-product is vital for UK livestock producers.
Furthermore, it says with Europe signalling farmers to produce less, there will be a negative impact on overall grain production and therefore food security.
The indirect impact on UK farmers is a reduction in export opportunities for biofuel crops; countries like Germany, the main importer of UK oilseed rape for that purpose, will buy less.
This prolonged and polarised debate on ILUC has reduced the level of ambition in Europe to promote biofuels, and the NFU has continued to reiterate the significant benefits sustainable biofuels have on the environment and the economy.
The NFU’s farmer expert on biofuels, Brett Askew, said that today’s result will do nothing but limit the scope of these potential benefits by imposing scientifically questionable ILUC factors and a cap on the contribution crop based biofuels can make in achieving the minimum of 10 per cent Renewable Transport Fuel by 2020.
Mr Askew, who is the NFU Crops Board Chairman for the North East of England, said: “Legislators have clearly been bullied into this U-turn by a series of environmental and social pressure groups that, until recently, stood shoulder to shoulder with industry and praised the potential contribution of biofuels in decarbonising the transport sector.
“The biofuel industry has led the way in demonstrating standards on farm in the UK, across Europe and subsequently raising sustainability around the world. Yet throughout this process these facts have been ignored with the misleading claim of a conflict between food and fuel distracting policy makers from their original focus: reducing European reliance on harmful fossil fuels in our transport system.
“MEPs have one last chance to demonstrate their commitment to decarbonising the European transport sector while at the same time decreasing the UK and Europe’s protein deficit. It is therefore vital that the compromise text is rejected in plenary on the 29th April.”