How SFI can help improve water quality on farm

11 February 2025

Environment and climate
River Stour

Farmers have an important role to play in making further improvements in our rivers, lakes, and groundwaters. We've outlined the different ways certain SFI actions can be used to improve water quality on and around farm. 

SFI actions

We have split the SFI actions aimed at improving water quality into three categories based around what farm or land type they apply to:

Both arable and grassland

There is a real mix of actions here that apply to fields used for both arable purposes and grasslands, from pond and ditch management to nutrient applications and soil testing (see table 1).

Soil management plan and soil organic matter testing

Assess soil, produce a soil management plan and test soil organic matter. CSAM1 helps you identify areas at risk of runoff, soil erosion, and soil compaction – all of which are relevant to water quality.

The waterbody actions (codes start with WBD) require risk of runoff and erosion to be identified, and this plan can be used to identify the risk.

SOM (Soil organic matter) levels are relevant to how much water the land can hold. For each field entered into this action, you need to have had a SOM test in the past five years. If you’ve not got done this, you need to obtain a SOM test in the first year of the agreement and tests then need to be kept up to date throughout the agreement – they must be no older than five years.

Nutrient management plan

The nutrient management plan (CNUM1) requires you to evaluate your current approach to nutrient usage and successfully plan how to manage nutrient usage more efficiently and effectively, and enhance your use of organic sources of crop nutrition.

Good nutrient management has benefits for the bottom line as well as for water quality. This action requires you to have the input of a FACTS-qualified adviser to help you optimise your nutrients.

Precision farming

Two actions, (PRF1 and PRF2), require the use of precision farming equipment to apply either nutrients or herbicides. The aim is to reduce the over-application of the product being applied, therefore reducing the potential of runoff into water bodies and saving you money.

Pond management

The aim here is to ensure there are ponds containing clear and clean water with a range of semi-aquatic vegetation allowed to develop around the edge.

Code SFI action Payment per hectare
CSAM1 Assess soil, produce a soil management plan and test soil organic matter. £6 per hectare per year and £97 per SFI agreement per year.
CNUM1 Assess nutrient management and produce a review report. £652 for assessment and report per year.
PRF1 Variable rate application of nutrients. £27
PRF2 Camera or remote sensor guided herbicide spraying. £43
BFS6 6m to 12m habitat strip next to watercourses. £742
WBD1 Manage ponds, maximum of 3 per hectare. £257 per pond per year.

Table 1: SFI options that apply to both arable and grassland fields aimed at improving water quality.

Arable

There are a number of SFI actions on arable land, including temporary grassland, that help improve water quality through protecting the soil surface, minimising its disturbance, and improving soil structure and composition (see table 2).

These changes can all help lower soil and nutrient loss from fields into water bodies.

Cover crops

Cover cropping protects the soil with green cover, reducing surface runoff to the benefit of water quality. With cover cropping, you need to think about how it could fit into your rotation.

SFI has multi-species cover crop actions for winter, spring and summer. There is also an action to provide green cover after maize (SOH4), which may require the earlier harvesting of maize to establish the cover before winter.

No-till

No-till farming is exactly as it sounds – the adoption of no-tillage farming techniques. This action aims to minimise soil disturbance, benefiting soil heath, fertility, structure, water storage and surface runoff.

Arable reversion

The arable reversion to grassland action (WBD4) involves creating a grass sward throughout the year with low fertiliser inputs.

The aim is to have minimal bare ground to protect the soil from the elements. The action is targeted at areas at risk of soil erosion or runoff, as identified in the soil management plan action above (CSAM1). The seed mix must have at least 5 grass species.

The aim of nil fertiliser supplement action (WBD9) is exactly that – no fertilisers or manures to be applied on arable land or permanent grassland.

As this is a supplemental action, it can only be done on eligible land that’s been put into either WBD4 or WBD5. The purpose is to lower the potential loss of nitrate to ground and surface water.

Grass and buffer strips

In-field grass strips and buffer strips adjacent to watercourses aim to lower the amount of sediment, nutrients and pesticides transported into water bodies via surface runoff, as well as provide habitats for wildlife.

This is done through establishing and maintaining a grass strip which has an intact grass sward, and shows no evidence of damage from vehicle or stock access routes.

Code SFI action Payment per hectare
SOH3 Multi-species summer-sown cover crop. £163
SOH2 Multi-species spring-sown cover crop. £163
CSAM2 Multi-species winter cover crop. £129
SOH4 Winter cover following maize crops. £203
OFA6 Undersown cereal crop (organic land). £380
CIPM4 No use of insecticide on arable crops and permanent crops. £45
SOH1 No-till farming. £73
CNUM3 Legume fallow £593
WBD4 Arable reversion to grassland with low fertiliser input. £489
WBD9 Nil fertiliser supplement (supplement to WBD4). £155
CAHL4 4m to 12m grass buffer strip on arable and horticultural land. £515
BFS1 12m to 24m watercourse buffer strip on cultivated land. £707
BFS2 Buffer in-field ponds on arable land. £681

Table 2: Arable SFI options aimed at improving water quality.

Grassland

Within the grassland-specific actions, there are targeted actions for highly productive grassland to improve water quality (table 3).

Herbal leys and legumes

Herbal (CSAM3) and legumes leys (CNUM2) provide a varied root structure, which is a good way of improving soil structure. They also include legumes, reducing your need for fertiliser or manures.

You get more benefit the longer you leave it in place, but you don’t have to keep it in the same location throughout the agreement.

Grassland next to watercourses

All the waterbody (WBD) actions here aim to create diverse grass swards on land which is adjacent to/drains into a watercourse.

This is done to lower surface runoff and risk of diffuse pollution to watercourses, and help reduce the risk of flooding. They restrict nutrients through stock removal or limited applications.

Reducing nutrient inputs and levels

The aim of grassland management with very low/to reduce nutrient levels (CLIG3, WBD8) is exactly as they say on the tin – to lower nutrient inputs to grassland and help limit nutrient levels in groundwater.

In both actions, an intact sward must be present throughout the year to reduce soil exposure to the elements.

Grassland field corners and blocks

The purpose of taking grassland field corners or blocks out of management (CILG1) is so that tussocky grass can develop, thereby providing a buffer to catch field runoff and provide a habitat for wildlife.

Code SFI action Payment per hectare
CSAM3 Herbal leys. £382
CNUM2 Legumes on improved grassland. £102
WBD5 Manage intensive grassland adjacent to a watercourse. £311
WBD9 Nil fertiliser supplement (supplement to WBD5). £156
WBD6 Remove livestock from intensive grassland during the autumn and winter (outside SDAs). £115
WBD7 Remove livestock from grassland during the autumn and winter (SDAs). £115
CLIG3 Manage grassland with very low nutrient inputs. £151
WBD8 Manage grassland to reduce nutrient levels in groundwater. £396
CILG1 Take grassland field corners or blocks out of management. £333
CLIG3 4m to 12m grass buffer strip on improved grassland £235
BFS3 Buffer in-field ponds on improved grassland. £311

Table 3: Grassland SFI options aimed at improving water quality.

The wider offer

Across SFI there are other actions that support the improvement of water quality.

For example, maintaining or establishing hedgerow trees (CHRW3) can improve water quality by trapping sediment, nutrients and pollutants before it reaches a watercourse. They also benefit soil structure. This is just one example.

Please see the NFU’s Farming Investment Fund schemes page and water quality pages for further information on additional funding and guidance available to help you improve water quality on your farm.

More from NFUonline:

NFU members, join our Environment and climate community to comment

SFI

Ask us a question about this page

Once you have submitted your query someone from NFU CallFirst will contact you. If needed, your query will then be passed to the appropriate NFU policy team.

You have 0 characters remaining.

By completing the form with your details on this page, you are agreeing to have this information sent to the NFU for the purposes of contacting you regarding your enquiry. Please take time to read the NFU’s Privacy Policy if you require further information.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.